|
|
Post by specialk on Nov 2, 2005 17:33:21 GMT
Ok as rocketman said he is open to ideas for development at both shockplay and miniclip then thought we would have a thread to voice them in. This is no way is an official representation of cm - really don't want to get into that but it means that rm can look in one place. Have been in these debates before where people want to make shock like mini and mini like shock hahahahahaha I personally think its good to have the two different styles but also know some like to play in one place but like the features of the other. Anyway ideas and debate (friendly) is welcome I will kick off by saying I love the new jewels - don't know if there are plans for anymore but whilst 50 k is a goal it is one beyond most people's real comprehension (except for those who are deluded - off to the padded cell with you) So...... more jewels (maybe less precious) so ruby emeral sappire etc. at 20 k 30k and 40k I think would be good. It would also make the board sparkle and look very pretty  |
|
|
|
Post by CmonYouSpurs on Nov 2, 2005 17:38:12 GMT
I think you should do away with losing points when you lose.............just points for when you win.
This would then stop a lot of the declining that goes on.
|
|
|
|
Post by specialk on Nov 2, 2005 18:25:34 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by CmonYouSpurs on Nov 2, 2005 18:33:04 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by toasted on Nov 2, 2005 18:33:21 GMT
Maybe they could link the "walk" button to the national grid?  |
|
|
|
Post by CmonYouSpurs on Nov 2, 2005 18:40:37 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 2, 2005 20:06:52 GMT
My theory is that 1 diamond for 20,000..
2 for 35,000..
and 3 for 50,000..
it would keep 3 gold stars from leaving once they got them... few stay and get more points..
|
|
|
|
Post by rocketman on Nov 3, 2005 11:39:01 GMT
I think you should do away with losing points when you lose.............just points for when you win. This would then stop a lot of the declining that goes on. That is an interesting idea. There will of course be a lot of inflation in the scores in this case. And the more you play, the more points you will get. And how much score a player has, might not indicate how good he is, rather, how much he has played. |
|
|
|
Post by CmonYouSpurs on Nov 3, 2005 11:46:46 GMT
I think you should do away with losing points when you lose.............just points for when you win. This would then stop a lot of the declining that goes on. That is an interesting idea. There will of course be a lot of inflation in the scores in this case. And the more you play, the more points you will get. And how much score a player has, might not indicate how good he is, rather, how much he has played. that is very true and a very good point............ #thumb# |
|
|
|
Post by specialk on Nov 3, 2005 12:20:17 GMT
I have asked for this before but I expect you all forgot hahahah
I want pink stars at 6000 points - I have my own that I stick on the screen when I get to this point but they are making a real mess of my screen - don't you all think they would look pretty? ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 3, 2005 12:25:19 GMT
I have asked for this before but I expect you all forgot hahahah I want pink stars at 6000 points - I have my own that I stick on the screen when I get to this point but they are making a real mess of my screen - don't you all think they would look pretty? ;D no they would not..  |
|
|
|
Post by CmonYouSpurs on Nov 3, 2005 12:27:30 GMT
I have asked for this before but I expect you all forgot hahahah I want pink stars at 6000 points - I have my own that I stick on the screen when I get to this point but they are making a real mess of my screen - don't you all think they would look pretty? ;D i thought we were being serious  |
|
