|
Post by zubin on Sept 1, 2005 12:40:19 GMT
Gladiators or wimps?
|
|
|
Post by dylan on Sept 1, 2005 19:18:35 GMT
wimps - definately. Give me a good game of rugby where the lads don't need to wear so much protective clothing and have to play for more than five mins at a time - wimps wimps wimps
|
|
|
Post by zubin on Sept 2, 2005 10:50:19 GMT
not rugby with amour then?
|
|
|
Post by dylan on Sept 2, 2005 14:29:38 GMT
not rugby with amour then? LOL ;D
|
|
|
Post by zubin on Sept 5, 2005 9:07:43 GMT
and why do they have such childish names?
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 5, 2005 10:01:45 GMT
childish names?.. I'm not sure what you mean here..
|
|
|
Post by CmonYouSpurs on Sept 12, 2005 17:31:32 GMT
|
|
|
Post by happy on Sept 12, 2005 21:13:00 GMT
wimps.....wots with all that padding I wouldnt mind padding those big big men
|
|
|
Post by CmonYouSpurs on Sept 12, 2005 21:32:25 GMT
wimps.....wots with all that padding I wouldnt mind padding those big big men under all that padding they are very small men
|
|
|
Post by toasted on Sept 15, 2005 17:08:28 GMT
Wimps definately. And boring too...all those breaks in play get very tedious. I've always wondered aswell why when there isn't a forward pass on they don't just pass it sideways and go round the man like in rugby.Instead they would rather just run straigh into the oncoming defender . I think the enjoy the man to man contact a little too much the big jessies. ;D
|
|